Shortly,
Putting the litigation regarding the 49ers to one side; the flag ship piece of litigation is what remains of HCMP 1679 of 1999 and the further litigation regarding Clause 22. If you don't know what this is, I suggest you do some research.
If you do not what it is, you will also be aware that Clause 22 came about as a result of "negotations" with the company and the conditions of Clause 22 were abandoned by the company when they became uncceptable to them. If you are not prepared to litigate to enforce such Clauses, why bother negotiating them in the first place?
Indeed, why bother with negotiation. Under your proposals, any new "AOA management" would have what tools to negotiate with? ...begging per chance???
Last edited by Liam Gallagher; 26th September 2002 at 01:55.