Originally Posted by
Monty Gordo
Call 100
I think your comments are a trifle harsh given the circumstances. Firstly it was CV that had the problem and BHX was one of a number of airports that could have benefitted from its demise. It certainly was not stealing the business.
That BHX under what has been the harshest economic climate since the 1930s has grown the business, some would suggest substantially, does deserve some credit.
Passenger numbers and airline development is certainly another matter but, in this circumstance, i think it should be plaudits and not brickbats.
Sorry you feel the comments were harsh but I stand by them. That does not mean I take it away from the man who convinced them to stay...(Not marketing!!).
Yes cargo has increased dramatically, but, from an extremely low base. Before CVT's collapse Cargo at BHX was restricted to one aircraft on the freight apron and Belly freight. I'll be more inclined to give plaudits if the increase is continued at such levels over the next 12 months.
Maybe they can resurrect the 'Freight West' plans..
It's always nice to see full aprons, which ever side of the runway they are. Lets hope someone can find an increase for the other side...