Seeing as how we seem intent on side tracking the thread.
Please explain to me how me pointing out that the death of an individual from an unrelated industrial accident should have any bearing on Monococks right to complain about a landing fee? I have no idea if the recent death of a member of the Kemble staff had any bearing on the professionalism of the staff or not. If they were that compromised that it had bearing on this discussion then it opens up a whole new discussion.
As it is Kemble have responded to the discussion and shown both sides of the story. As seems to be the case with these things there are indeed two sides to the story.
Just because someone knows someone who has died does not make it right to attempt to censure free speech.
There is a thread running that allows people to pay tribute to the gentleman concerned.