Which one of the impositions would you like me to start with?
and the fact that you all believed a company when they asked you to work a month for free because they were in financial difficulties, followed by the top management of this company in financial difficulties awarding themselves large bonuses, and then look at the individuals who took large amounts of money to break the strike. We are all well aware of the amounts of money paid out to break this strike. It beggers belief that those same people would say they are backing the company. No they were lining their pockets, other wise they would have volunteered for free is that not the sentiment of volunteering
Care to produce any evidence? Or is it just from the "BASSA big book of facts"?
Because you're talking rubbish. Nobody got paid anything more that their normal rates.