Once again, no...the quoted conditions appear to be from an airCRAFT insurance document, not an airPORT one. Hence, the aircraft would be uninsured, but it has no relevance to the airport.
I stand corrected.
I hope you read NOTAMs and the like better than you read some of these posts; could be a safety issue otherwise...
One point I made remains valid. In the event of litigation, lawyers look for anyone to sue, and will certainly go for the airfield operator if they can find any case for liability. Even successfully defending a legal action can be expensive.