The fact that Bassa will be advised against IA from the legal team will come as no surprise to anyone. So, what will happen now? There will be blood from the active militants, who, having been whipped up to an emotional frenzy, crave another strike to let BA know 'they're not going to be messed with' - even if they're not sure what benefit it will bring them.
P767, the height of hypocrisy is, in my view, where a leader of a union, ie a representative of a work force, who is no longer a member of said workforce, is allowed to remain in office. Can you not see there could be a conflict of interest? Can you not see what an invidious situation that puts all the strike advocates in? Lambs to the slaughter comes to mind.
However, if Bassa are indeed advised there can be no legal/protected strike action, it will be very interesting to see what the next move in all this will be? Any views anyone?
Oh yes, and by the way, despite a demand to know the ins and outs of the PCCC, I note there has STILL been no response regarding the allocation of subs/funds received from the, albeit dwindling, Bassa membership! Hmm?!