Whilst I understand and appreciate the sentiments of all concerned when an airline experiences financial difficulties that may result in the loss of aircrew jobs, please think of the bigger picture.
My company is a creditor of the Air Holland previous version. We lost a considerable amount of money when they went out of business. We have no prospect of recovering that money. We had hoped that the success of the new version might bring some recompense (no way). So, my question is, how can an airline walk away from its' responsibilities, be given a second chance, without any accountability and then be allowed to screw their suppliers a second time round?
If they then get the financial backing talked about here, is anyone going to force them to face their previous commitments? I doubt it.
Last edited by Cumulonimbus; 3rd Sep 2002 at 07:27.