for the CC89/Amicus above:
- any settlement must also address the initial issues that caused the dispute, especially imposition, and the continuing breaking of our agreements.
And so they very neatly put in the public domain a document linking the current ballot (and therefore any strike) to the original dispute.
(Or have I mis-interpreted the document?)
Surely someone in the Unions must realise that, despite it being obvious this is a continuation of the dispute, that they need to ensure they don't actually connect the two, hence making it possible to claim it is not connected. And by publicly stating they are connected, they are doing their members no favours at all.
They can't organise consecutive strikes without having a strategy to ensure they aren't connected, but think they can manage an airline....
