Lb
Not at all, but it is a question of time scales. It is perfectly reasonable IMO to say 'now' do not vote if you are not a member. But, is it reasonable to be sending ballots to people who have made every reasonable effort, and more, to resign and to stop the union mailshots.
The question is whether in a court the resonableness of the former outweighs the unreasonableness of the latter, especially when the accuracy of membership details has played such a large part in the procedings over the last year and a half. I know where I stand but I'm not a judge. Does 1 statement now excuse 18 months of administrative chaos?
Regards