Info from 'another place' -
I think we can all see that a NO vote to the strike call means that BA, the Company, wins and so do the staff. However the malcontents remain.
So what about a YES vote to the strike call. It only needs a majority of voters not a majority of CC. There may not be many voters so perhaps only 3000-3500 possible strikers.
I suggest that BA might ignore the strike call. The Company might say that it has taken legal advice and believes that this proposed strike is a continuation of the previous strike and the strikers are not protected in the same way from dismissal.
1. BA does not instigate any Court action.
2. BA advises the strikers that it contemplates dismissing them.
3. BA now has sufficient trained staff to crew the cabins on a very large number, perhaps as much as 90% of its flights and certainly 100% of the higher revenue earning flights.
4. The strike goes ahead, probably poorly supported.
5. BA dismisses the strikers.
6. The strikers have to take action against the Company.
7. The company refuses to re-employ the strikers.
8. BA offers a modest sum to each striker. This will hardly matter to the Company as expensive Legacy CC have been replaced by cheaper MF CC.
Will Unite fund the striker's legal action? I doubt it. The malcontents are gone and the cabin is a nicer place to work in.
This seems like a very fair appraisal of the situation.
For the deluded, the commies, the unwashed SWP 'types', the fantasists and general malcontents - TAKE NOTE!!!