Originally Posted by PC767
The chair of Bassa was prepared to accept that the agreement was needed - it was - but prefered the correct protocol to be used and would have liked to ensure the agreement was adhered to, unlike last time.
PC767 - How was the agreement not adhered too last time?
Having read the Disruption agreement I saw no mention of VCC's or MF crew - this as I understand it was an adhoc condition placed upon BA by the Bassa chairperson. So as I see it BA followed the 'correct protocol', it was Bassa that chose to vary the agreement.