essessdeedee.
Why do you believe Bassa thought there was no disruption? The chair of Bassa was prepared to accept that the agreement was needed - it was - but prefered the correct protocol to be used and would have liked to ensure the agreement was adhered to, unlike last time.
To my mind BA had no intention of adhering to any agreement and were ready to go ahead and do what they wanted at any rate, provided legislation was complied with. What they saw here was another opportunity to rile Bassa and a proportion of it's members, so they did. And those members rose to the bait again. Bassa itself hasn't made a big deal of what it most likely anticipated anyway.