In yesterday's BASSA newsletter, "DIGNITY - A DEFINING MOMENT", there was this:
For this now universally discredited British Airways management, the decision to suspend XXXXXX XXXXXX for simply organising a collection to support sacked fellow crew and their families over Christmas, and all that that means to people, could be that event.
For in that action, that one crass, heavy-handed, misjudged action, the very essence of what this whole dispute is about was there for all to see.
Dignity.
There can be no true peace until these wrongs are put right and Bill Francis et al have a change of heart on the way they do their business.
Okay, so a hearing has been held and I believe that the person in question has been reinstated due no case to answer. If that is the position, is DH satisfied that BA's procedures (agreed with the unions) are satisfactory? Or does he still think those procedures don't meet his requirements?