So in summary:
Run-dry is really expensive to do, Sikorsky wanted to do it but failed so they then used an argument that they didn't need it to get certified?
The Lappos rehetoric rings a bit hollow now.
That failure assesment will be very interesting in court as will the testimony of the FAA man who witnessed the first gearbox fail on test.
If the Canadian Cyclone is higher power dosen't that mean its gearbox will fail even faster without oil?