Either way, there are too many loopholes (refer to the CF and BASSA forums for details). I will vote NO to this proposal.
For the benefit of all those that do not go to CF or BASSA forum, can you explain what these loopholes are? Like I recaly you saying you wanted ST back - Done, and you wanted ACAS to review the disciplinaries for those suspended or sacked for actions pertaining to this dispute - Also quite clearly there in the agreement documents.
So as others have asked before me, what will it take you to say YES?