The continued removal and fitting of seats using one main taskcard and with no fault documentation for the seats that were rejected.. All the LITS was done by the back door methods (were they should not have been). The BOI slates them (and the seat bay)for not doing things to the JAP. The BOI couldn't work out what work was done between the MMPs and LITS and they had a lot more time and resources than the poor sod in the docs cell who had to co-ordinate the thing. The MMPs were correctly signed for work content (bar that complete blocks were signed by one signature, that the BOI disargeed on as they believe individual sub blocks should be signed, but that is contentious for mps done by all trades). However the trimings (like completing each page to tie it to the work order etc and completion of the the front sheets) were not done, although at least the MMPs were co-ordinated by the people involved. The card returned contained about 20 MMPs and was almost the same size as all other LITS generated documentation for that maintenance.
Exactely, they got a slating in the BOI, but you state they got off lightly. What are you driving at with that statement, do you think they should have been charged with manslaughter?