It wasn't a patch on LITS Maintenance Manger for fault recording.. It was modified to track a maintenance schedule and a planner could add addition work to the schedule.. There was a faults (NRC) system in it as well (based on rework requirement originally I bet), but nothing was transferable electronically to the operator system (LITS) and if the workers didn't put the asset info on the DMS fault job number such as part numbers, transfering to the LITS fault database was impossible. The tracked items would be highlighted on DMS chits, so usually were not a problem.
A PART 145 MRO will use the operators scheduled taskcards and raise its own NRCs (that the operator will get copies of with all spares used). BAE Systems were allowed to draft their own schedule (true it was based on the relevent 5A1 and followed the logical trail), but visiblity of work was lost by its breakdown to the pulse system (No civvy MRO uses that!) and the paperless system of viewing what work was outstanding (again, no MRO works that way).
Last edited by Alber Ratman; 22nd Oct 2010 at 20:05.