Hi,
Infrequentflyer 789
Not sure we are reading the same report, but the copy I've got has extensive discussion on the flight operations issue (regulations on these type of flights - or rather lack of) and the qualification of the sensors themselves, and the change in flight control laws.
Of the 6 safety recommendations, only 1 is for the crew, and that is regarding approach-to-stall training. I think that is justified - this isn't the only recent case of a stall recovery being messed up. Nor is failure to correct pitch-up trim an airbus-only problem in stall recovery.
Even that recommendation is not really critical of the crew, given that the recommendation is regarding training, and that the report specifically states that the approach-to-stall procedure was followed.
Indeed .. and the report I wanted to read was ....
HOW? :
Loss Control A320
WHY? (Depending on model REASON chronological order):
Bore hole in the plate "builder" technology choices
Bore hole in the plate "feedback": 2 events prior untapped
Bore hole in the plate "maintenance": non-compliance procedures
Bore hole in the plate "cockpit": low-speed tests carried out in an improvised manner