Originally Posted by
jcjeant
Hi,
Do you see that in the BEA report ?
And what about the analysis of each reason panels ?
Why focus on the lastest (cockpit) ?
If any of the foregoing is eliminated .. the accident is unlikely to occur.
Has the BEA in its recommendations will eliminate these panels?
Not sure we are reading the same report, but the copy I've got has extensive discussion on the flight operations issue (regulations on these type of flights - or rather lack of) and the qualification of the sensors themselves, and the change in flight control laws.
Of the 6 safety recommendations, only 1 is for the crew, and that is regarding approach-to-stall training. I think that is justified - this isn't the only recent case of a stall recovery being messed up. Nor is failure to correct pitch-up trim an airbus-only problem in stall recovery.
Even that recommendation is not really critical of the crew, given that the recommendation is regarding
training, and that the report specifically states that the approach-to-stall procedure was
followed.