PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Lufthansa Hamburg
View Single Post
Old 12th Mar 2010, 21:16
  #99 (permalink)  
CONF iture
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: W of 30W
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One more time, an incident, as it happened in HAM, can bring questions on the Airbus technical options.

I can see a serious issue with that roll rate demand coupled to the side sticks the way Airbus opted to implement them :
  1. The PF has no way to evaluate the amount of deflection on the flight control surfaces in relation to his own side stick displacement.
  2. The PM has no way to know what the PF request is.
  3. And now on top of it we learn that the flight controls deflection can be suddenly reduced by 50%
Too much unknown, too much guessing.

What about keeping things simple ?
  1. Linked side sticks to keep the PM in the loop
  2. Direct law to keep both PF and PM in that same loop
It doesn’t matter above 1000 feet but for a crew, there is a waste of valuable information when things heat up close to the ground.
HAM is remarquable on that regard.
CONF iture is offline