Read the thread with interest - however one thing does stand out to me - all the accusations flying around about the 'fake' website, which I believe was made public by the PCCC. And the PCCC being the organisation that actually placed an individuals name in the public domain who allegedly purchased the domain name - are you too just as guilty as those who have been suspended for merely discussing or being in possession of an alleged list of strike breakers? Where is the difference?
The name of the rep who allegedly registered the fake website was obtained from a publicly available source, so it is not the same as the list of alleged strike breakers which was confidential information subject to the Data Protection Act.
The two are completely different things altogether.