A question to the PCCC
Read the thread with interest - however one thing does stand out to me - all the accusations flying around about the 'fake' website, which I believe was made public by the PCCC. And the PCCC being the organisation that actually placed an individuals name in the public domain who allegedly purchased the domain name - are you too just as guilty as those who have been suspended for merely discussing or being in possession of an alleged list of strike breakers? Where is the difference?