I don't believe that one is better than the other I simply believe that its a licence and that the test standards are the same regardless of weather you go integrated or modular. The problem is that its a fact that a graduate of Oxford or CTC etc etc will have more chances.
Even now the CTC cadets who have graduated into nothing, have there CV on file with CTC and when the upturn comes they will walk straight into jobs with the airlines, which have partnered with CTC. Its the same with Oxford and British Airways. An individual as a holder of a fATPL from any other establishment cannot apply for these jobs, they have been exclusivley reserved for the individuals who have paid top dollar for flight training which most of us ordinary chaps cannot afford. How is that fair? You don't even get a chance to apply for a job with many of CTC's partner airlines because they have taken up all the slots!
Thats wrong and thats why its not equal, I don't see universities promising employment with XYZ companies on there advertisements, so why are flight schools able to do this? If the likes of EZY, British Airways etc want people trained to a specific standard then they should open an academy or bring back full scaled sponsorship, they should not be operating some half baked tagging scheme via a flight school where only those that are financially capable are able to attend. No one for a second cannot deny that this practice is excluding some very capable individuals