But isn't it unfair that, having voted No, a person is free to undermine any consequent strike, but if a person strikes in spite of a No vote they (more likely their Union) face damages? I think people should have the choice to follow their conscience, but it seems fair that the consequences ought to be balanced. So, if people do undermine the collective position (ie work following a Yes vote), shouldn't they be open to similar claims for damages by their colleagues/Union, as is the case where strikes are not properly sanctioned? And isn't that a better solution than the risk of harrasment etc that many have expressed fears of on here?
You can't have it all ways guys.
Last edited by JayPee28bpr; 2nd Dec 2009 at 17:01.
Reason: Logic error