I think that about says it all...there's been lots of boo-hooing based on an article that may or may not be enitreley accurate, spun to achieve a certain message, or just plain bollocks. Most of you reading this will have been in a position to "know" at some point in your career and will have read something you knew was patently false in the press but that struck great, anguish-filled chords in the editorial pages (or, dare I say, the blogosphere). At that point, you probably rolled your eyes and commented to your co-workers about the press adn those who believe them. I guess I'd just question how factual the statements we're using to castigate our allies are?
I will say it has been fun reading the thread, though...very impressive that folks have lost all credibility along the way!
