Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

US to withhold F-35 fighter software codes

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

US to withhold F-35 fighter software codes

Old 25th Nov 2009, 00:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: England
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
US to withhold F-35 fighter software codes

Looks like the USA is not going to supply source codes for F35 software to anyone:

EXCLUSIVE-US to withhold F-35 fighter software codes - Forbes.com

"That includes everybody," he said, acknowledging this was not entirely popular among core partners -- Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, Canada, Australia, Denmark and Norway.

"Nobody's happy with it completely. but everybody's satisfied and understands," he said of withholding the code from partners and Israel, which also has sought the technology transfer as part of a possible purchase of up to 75 F-35s

Good to know where we stand..........

OP
Orange Poodle is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 07:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: devon
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well that answers the question of what they'll do with the shed they kept the Chinooks in then!
arandcee is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 07:46
  #3 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,231
Received 1,502 Likes on 679 Posts
I won't bother going back and digging them out, but successive SecDefs have stated that access to the codes was a prerequisite for a UK purchase.

No codes - no UK F-35 buy.

I wonder if the government will stick by that or now back down?
ORAC is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 07:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not the first time that they have done this - good to see what 'Special Relationship' really means. Blair really did make the UK Americas' lap dog
anotherthing is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 07:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am betting the source includes a routine for "No missile launch" and "Americans can turn the engine off mid flight" delivered by link 16 then?
VinRouge is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 08:28
  #6 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 81
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even more reason to stop the extradition of the guy who hacked into the Pentagon's computer, we need him to hack the source code.
green granite is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 10:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: somewhere...everywhere
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a GREAT idea Granite...get Gary McKinnon on the case.

Flying Serpent is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 10:30
  #8 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,437
Received 89 Likes on 50 Posts
Big deal! China probably has it already...
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 10:59
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old Gordo could be rubbing his hands here. An excellent excuse to duck out of the purchase saving squillions. he then decides there's no need for a carrier with no aircraft, another few squillion. No people required to man the non-existent kit, even more savings.

Of course, I could be wrong.
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 11:09
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sussex, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A quick question - without the opportunity to examine the source code, would it be possible to confirm airworthiness of the aircraft before entry into service?

TN

p.s. Green Granite
Thor Nogson is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 11:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In the middle of the sea
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not the first time that they have done this - good to see what 'Special Relationship' really means. Blair really did make the UK Americas' lap dog
Not forgeting our deceitful stab in the back from our 'pals' across the water back in the late 1940's during the contest of supersonic flight.

Britain has been Americas' lap dog before Blair was even born!
Scotteo is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 11:45
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stamford
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Even with access to source code proving software correctness is almost impossible. It certainly isn't cheap in terms of man hours or money.

History has shown that software bugs will exist in almost all non-trivial code regardless of how much testing is implemented.

History's Worst Software Bugs

I'm surprised the Airbus A320 crash at the French airshow didn't make the list but there are plenty of air and space examples in there.

Edit: Fixed the link
Stuff is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 12:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sussex, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stuff
Even with access to source code proving software correctness is almost impossible. It certainly isn't cheap in terms of man hours or money.
I understand that. With 8 million lines of code, there will inevitably be some bugs, but my question is whether it can be certified as airworthy?

Can the MOD just take the manufacturers word for it? Are they allowed to?

TN
Thor Nogson is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 12:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Meanwhile Australia has just confirmed their order of the JSF will go ahead despite U.S. officials saying they will keep secret the sensitive software codes to be used in the radar-evading fighter, limiting the ability of investor
countries to maintain and upgrade the fighters without U.S. involvement.
The single-engine F-35 can switch quickly between air-to-ground and
air-to-air missions while still flying -- tricks heavily dependent on its 8
million lines of onboard software code.

(Australian news article).
Razor61 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 13:37
  #15 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The single-engine F-35 can switch quickly between air-to-ground and air-to-air missions while still flying

So could the Hunter.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 13:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dre's mum's house
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The single-engine F-35 can switch quickly between air-to-ground and
air-to-air missions while still flying -- tricks heavily dependent on its 8
million lines of onboard software code
The switch from air - to - air to air - to -ground, software dependant, could result, if it's a little "buggy," in the air - to - ground being a "once only - disassemble Johnny 5" style manoeuvre!
The Real Slim Shady is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 13:51
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And, more importantly, the F/A-18!
Benjybh is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 14:23
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..and most other aircraft that carried a-a and a-s stuff...(at the same time)
L J R is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 15:36
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buster Hyman wrote:
<<Big deal! China probably has it already... >>
You hit the nail on the head, I think – trouble happened with another aircraft with the latest advanced avionics (can't remember off the top of my head just now – could have been an F16 or F18 variant?) - Israel supplied the software to China.
The USA can hardly give such software to some friendlies and not Israel, can it? Hence the new stuff can't go to anyone.
walter kennedy is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 16:30
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you are missing the point Walter, by 9000 miles or so.
glad rag is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.