Don't you mean the Anti-BASSA thread... much more appropriate!
So, not having received an answer to my previous question... how does flying 1 down but getting a one-down payment not compromise safety, but working one-down for free does..... I really would like to know.... As will the Judge in Feb.
Unless of course "safety" is only being mentioned to try and scaremonger the public, generate headlines, and try and generate sympathy.
Unless someone comes up with a logical reasoned answer to the above, we can assume it will be laughed out of court....can anyone else speculate on what arguments might be used in court? It's not safety, it's not contractual, it may be a breach of an agreement, but I believe BASSA has been breaking these agreements as well, so all is fair in love and war and all that... It's not about hot towels, surely?!?!?
CB