If a trade union cannot reach a collective agreement with the employer, an employer can impose changes other than contractual changes providing 90 days notice is given. Did BA not give the 90 days notice? Or will the court be deliberating over whether one cabin crew removed from an aircraft is a contractual change or not?
I thought this 90 day notice had already been served back in July/August time? So BA is perfectly within it's rights to change the contracts aren't they? This is why i'm a little confused over BASSA's attempts to stop them now. They had the warning, and time to react, surely it's too late?