I know nothing of the facts of this dispute but some of the assertions in this thread strike me as a little naïve.
happybiker
To imply that CAA "gets seriously upset" shows a lack of understanding on their function.
Given that the CAA's function (just like that of any other organisation) is performed by human beings, perhaps it shows an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of human nature.
I have no idea whether anyone is being vindictive in this instance, but people with power can be vindictive even without going outside the powers available to them.
eg By nitpicking. By applying laws/regulations strictly to the letter instead of exercising sensible discretion.
PPRuNe Pop
An appeal process is unlikely to be of help if,
according to the letter of the law, the person exercising his/her power is entitled to act as he/she has - even if anyone with a modicum of common sense would have used sensible discretion, and even if the same person (or a predecessor) has previously done so.
(Again, a general point - not specific to this dispute.)
.