Big Nose 1:
Apologies for not including Prospect nor acknowledging their contribution to the working group. Also I appear to have misrepresented myself in your assumption that I don't want the operational staff to look at the new fonts, I do and I would think that all the back room staff do to. We are just FRUSTRATED that no-one seems to be saying yea or nay!!!
"NO NO NO, we all think the displays are less then average, you seem to think that because there are not 100 complaints a day everything is ok"
How can anyone tell something is wrong unless you complain? Its no good sitting muttering in a corner.
"Your attitude is sadly typical of all that is wrong in NATS, there is no problem so why do i have do waste my time fixing it."
Its certainly NOT a waste of my time, its what I'm there to do WHEN someone tells me EXACTLY what the problem is and WHAT they want done to 'fix' it. The normal gripe of 'I don't like it, get it fixed' is simply not good enough.
"Do you actually believe the displays are good or not ?"
Having had 12 years experience in Area Radar before joining NATS and then doing some feed work for a year and instruction for a year I do not have a problem with the displays, although I do need to wear my specs, which I didn't at ScOACC or LATCC.