I am based at a busy aerodrome within the confines of a MATZ (but not the Rule 45 ATZ). Whenever I call the published VHF freq inbound or outbound response is usually tardy and the call is received with little apparent interest and the provision of a totally inappropriate pressure setting. I do not recall ever having had any traffic information. If the military really do want extended protection from civilian aircraft they should apply for a 5nm radius Rule 45 ATZ then we will all know exactly where we are. From radar observation MATZ dimensions are inappropriate for the traffic patterns which they are supposed to protect and consequently, IMHO, not worth the paper they are printed on as far as civilian pilots are concerned. The MATZ Penetration Service is an incongruous entry in a civilian IAIP. It is neither one thing nor the other. Little wonder that MATZ Penetration is misunderstood.