Whilst BASSA members get all of the relevant information and a vote I'm not sure what CC89 members get even tho they are part of the same union .
Suddentwang, Amicus (new name for CC89) members will also have to vote. Word on the ground is that Amicus originally wanted to negotiate on the BA proposals, but BASSA rushed in with their ridiculous Pilot-copycat proposal.
Will be interesting to see whether the two branches now stick together or whether Amicus, as previously, forge their own path. They had 100% vote for
continued negotiations at the last meeting - as opposed to the BASSA 100% against!
Can Amicus register a failure to agree, without first consulting the members, if the members voted for continued negotiations? They need to stay true to their members' desire for continued negotiations, and not be led by BASSA.