£173M
As I understand it now, Bassa are working on a breakdown on how they achieved the £173M savings that was part of the proposal.
So, let me get this straight: They said that they could save £173M, but no costing or analysis. Now they are working on the breakdown to 'prove' the savings.
Er is it just me or is that the wrong way round? It seems to me that they are now frantically trying to make sums fit an answer they have already given!!!!