It's his train set so if you don't like it, start your own website.
Completely agreed. I don't know just whose train set it is, but I know for certain that I am a guest, not an entitled user. Thus I will post by the rules, or graciously step back.
I generally see no need to identify persons, aircraft or specific locations prior to the final report doing so, and even at that point, getting personal does not improve the value of the content for learning purposes.
I have previously posted that I feel more comfortable, particularly in fatal crashes, discussing the report of the accident, rather than the accident itself. That way people who are close to the event have time to deal with things. I can be patient. Only in cases where some major defect in a fleet is suddenly exposed by a crash, do we really need to know right away. In those cases, we'll have safety action from the relevent authority to discuss, rather than the crash itself.
I find myself sometimes having to re-read the name of this website, just to remind myself why I chose this one (and only this one) to spend my effort. We are trying to present to each other as Professionals, right?
Pilot DAR