I agree with Beagle’s comments on the form SRG\1119.
It must be the most absurd piece of paperwork ever produced by the CAA. The previous LST and LPC forms were at least workable and both the examiner and the candidate could utilise those forms to determine what had to be included in the test/check. The latest offering from the Belgrano fails totally to address the content of an LST or LPC for SPA, and as worded for an MPA the form succeeds in making every single item discretionary.
Luckily the CAA have not written to examiners informing us of the introduction of the new form therefore since I have not been told of its existence I do not know of its existence and will continue to utilise the previous forms.