PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Turkish airliner crashes at Schiphol
View Single Post
Old 3rd Mar 2009, 13:30
  #933 (permalink)  
Dysag
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: southwest
Age: 78
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lomapaseo

What do you mean? I may not have quoted the FAA verbatim, but sometimes I know what I'm talking about.

BTW, on the A300 et al, Airbus adopted a different means of compliance: that the engines should stay firmly attached.

Para 1.6.3.1 of the Dutch investigation into the El Al 747 accident.

http://www.verkeerenwaterstaat.nl/ke...light_1862.pdf

and:

BW Online | July 5, 1993 | BOEING: FOR WANT OF A PIN...

and:

FAR Part 25.561 General.

...(c) For equipment, cargo in the passenger compartments and any other large masses, the following apply:
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, these items must be positioned so that if they break loose they will be unlikely to:
(i) Cause direct injury to occupants;
(ii) Penetrate fuel tanks or lines or cause fire or explosion hazard by damage to adjacent systems; or......

Last edited by Dysag; 3rd Mar 2009 at 14:32.
Dysag is offline