PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Licensed vice Non-Licensed Airfields in the UK
Old 24th Jan 2009, 18:19
  #19 (permalink)  
Bravo73
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,960
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Why would "fire cover" be more important than say....ATC?
I always presumed that the requirement for fire cover was because there is potentially a higher risk of bending an aircraft during initial or ab-initio training. The fire crew need to be there to help pull anyone out of the wreckage.



Originally Posted by TorqueStripe
Bravo73, according to a post above North Denes has H2 fire cover - so why isn't it licensed ?
Fire cover is obviously a requirement for licencing. But having fire cover doesn't automatically grant a facility a licence. I've got no idea why North Denes isn't licenced.
Bravo73 is offline