PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Nimrod R1 replacement
View Single Post
Old 7th January 2009 | 22:33
  #43 (permalink)  
Riskman
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Somerset
sprucemoose
Pointless semantics, Riskman. The article says the three development aircraft are not under contract, and by definitition that means that they are not under contract "yet".
and implies that they won't be on contract, ever!

Not pointless semantics. It was speculation which was wrong when it was written and is still wrong now.
Riskman is offline  
Reply