what's that smell?
something does not smell right here
how, in the reasoning of the arbitrator, is a company such as polar, supposed to buy new airplanes (or dry-lease) and remain competitive if they must pay someone to sit at home while there is no job anymore?
please educate me
if buggy-whip makers were union, does that mean that ford and chrysler would have to pay buggy-whip makers (with pay retro-active to 1897?) to stay at home until horse-drawn carriages come back in fashion?
i sincerely would appreciate a kind-hearted explanation
would the ruling stand if atlas were to immediately (now) dispose of all classics? these aircraft are not flying due to economic conditions today, and this could trigger that type of response from the management team
thanks