Your defence of Chappie does you credit. However, before you offer me advice, be sure of your facts. You are wrong in ascribing any illusions about the inquest to me. I have not referred to the inquest or to Chappie's part in it.
And in respect to her statements in the first two posts of this thread, which she started, including her personal comments about the motives of Sir Jock Stirrup, I'm afraid she is well wide of the mark and has been misled into believing what the Independant report said and implied.
I reaffirm my admiration for her. However, in this particular area her instinct has failed her.