curi;
Is posible a tire explosion of landing gear. The airplane when was taxing, returned to parking because have problems with Outisde and RAM sensor, but isīnt problem for GO, the difference is what are use the tables and calculate the effective EPR.
The tire doesn't explode but yes, it is possible the tire shed some tread and it is possible that it went into the engine. This has happened before on airplanes with engines at the rear and it has caused engine damage.
The RAM sensor usually does not have anything to do with the engines. I am not familiar with the MD82 MEL but likely it would be a "GO" item. The engines have their own sensors as you know.
sevenstrokeroll;
The tires are immediately suspect in this model; not so much the 72'. I agree with you - it has happened before but without result except for loss of engine power. I am familiar with the DC9 accident at Toronto in June, 1978 in which an overrun resulted from a rejected takeoff right at V1 - the right tire shed the re-cap, (it remained inflated), caused the engine to falter and also put the right gear unsafe light on (tore out the switch & shorted the warning). The aircraft overran into the same gulley Air France 258 overran into but unlike AF, the '9 didn't burn, thankfully - it was at MGTOW, 108,000lbs.
wileydog2:
You can actually perform a V1 cut and NEVER use ailerons and keep the wings level and the nose going straight.
Good explanation.
In fact, that's how it was taught in the DC9 sim, esp. for someone who was having a bit of trouble keeping his/her hands off the control wheel and using a lot of aileron, which one
never, ever should do for the reasons you give. At rotation, with the 15deg or so attitude established, the engine would be cut and the candidate would have to put his/her hands down beside them and control yaw using rudder alone. It was a great teaching technique and an even better confidence builder. Works for all aircraft, even the 'bus ;-)
PJ2