PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - New ATC phraseology
View Single Post
Old 28th July 2008 | 10:28
  #16 (permalink)  
bookworm
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 2
From: UK
crewcostcontrol, it's been done here already if you want to do a search but basically "cleared ILS" gives implicit clearance to descend to the altitude that the ils approach starts.
What's the regulatory basis for this? Something in PANS-OPS, PANS-ATM or one of the Annexes?

In a previous thread I see I wrote:

"It's not legitimate to descend to the MDA, but when "cleared for the approach" it is permitted to descend to the charted intercept altitude (where you'd be for a procedural approach)."

but I don't appear to have cited the regulatory basis, and can't find anything in other threads.

I still think this different UK phraseology, which will continue to cause endless confusion, is a lousy solution to a problem that no other state appears to have. I can't believe Heathrow is unique in requiring descent on a glideslope while maintaining separation from traffic below.
bookworm is offline  
Reply