Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

New ATC phraseology

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

New ATC phraseology

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jul 2008, 09:13
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: EPKT
Age: 44
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you have seen a few 747's descend to their MDA over central London because they have been told "cleared ILS approach" you very soon learn to use the phase "when established localiser descend on ILS". Keep your licence safe.
I wonder, why UK can't just publish approach charts with corrected, higher FAP altitudes (not colliding with neighbour procedures). ATCO is still allowed to vector a/c below these altitudes (see MRVA) if needed.
Wojtus is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2008, 12:43
  #22 (permalink)  
VSD
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: FRANCE
Age: 32
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Phraseology, perhaps can only be found in HK

We have these:

"ZYX456 standby, handover in progress"
"TCAS traffic, traffic left to right xxx"
"Traffic for your TCAS, xxx"
"XYZ123 direct OCEAN"
.....................

The trainer train people to use these phraseologies.
VSD is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2008, 16:07
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: YYZ via the UK
Age: 49
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Turn left/right heading to intercept DESCEND ON THE GLIDEPATH! Cleared ILS XX"

So uncomplicated! Covers your back in giving the altitude restriction of the glidepath and saves RT transmission times by aircraft NOT having to call established.

I am a convert after having worked the old UK way before. It has been done to death on these boards because as has been mentioned..the UK seems to be the only place that has this confusion. The UK flights into YYZ all report established on the localiser even when they are not being asked to. Frustrating when busy!

Oh as for the giving the QNH with the descent on the ILS...ermm hasn't the pilot already had it on first contact...and first descent...why would they need it again on the ILS?? Unless it has changed in the interim?
Married a Canadian is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2008, 16:22
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QNH with the ILS descent is still in 413 and 493, however, at my unit, (and most other units I'm aware of) we are not required to give it.
Defruiter is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2008, 16:53
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Somerset England
Age: 62
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All very well and good the new clearances. That is until you get cleared for the ILS then get a bolliking for not reporting established!! this is a major UK airfield, please make your minds up what you want from us guys at the front.

"when established descend on the ILS" was the ATC instruction. Does that require an "established" call?
Flying Farmer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.