This data is from 2006 or earlier, so my memory might not
be too accurate. In Finland the MTCD did not work properly
enough, since the conflict detection is not based on strips anymore.
That was the major fault that I recall. The MTCD function should be
working perfectly since the fallback for that is the "eyeballing" only.
The other point is the user interface. 6 different windows to modify or enter data. AND 6 different user interfaces...
Seems as if there were 6 totally different design teams that did not pass
any information to each other about the logic (or lack of) in the other user interfaces.
In Finland the version that I remember was quite stable, and the fall back
systems that were designed seemed not to need to be used often. (By spring 2006).
I do not have any info about fault logs, so this is my personal experience.