Originally Posted by
Bla_Bla
my answer to that is that they should have fought for all new crew to be employed under the same conditions as u r. AT ALL COSTS.
You don't seem to understand that for the past 5 or so years, NO new long haul crew have been employed because they would have been employed on the same conditions as us.
The only way new crew would be employed on the same conditions as us is if we agreed to reduce our conditions to QCCA level.
Is this the "AT ALL COSTS" that you are talking about?