itchypuss, regards the beginning of your second paragraph of your posting on page 3 - Are you privy to some facts that the rest of us aren't ? If not how about placing a little more empasis on the IF ?!
Ah, thanks for that (hence the edit), you've just answered my question. So it might be fair to say that there were some questionable financial 'doings' occurring well before the newest group of directors took office ? Because that would then account for why so many directors seemingly came and went, i.e. it looked good (but who made it look good ?), they joined, then found out the truth, and left.
[ 16 December 2001: Message edited by: Old King Coal ]