meeting all requirements legal and administrative.
And thereby, from a safety point of view perhaps, hangs the tail. I'm sure that in the case of previous incidents the above was true
So what has been done to get out of the "minimum" requirements
What has been done to, possibly, exceed the minimum
If nothing well??
If the organisation had taken no action following the previous events
Just a word of interest. many folks on these threads seem to be against the ideas of Health & Safety and are happy to blame it for some of their woes!!
Consider this, most of the AirLaw, SOP's etc you operate to were formulated as a result of accidents & exist for your Health & Safety when flying, so whats the problem on the ground??
I have been involved with H & S for years and take the view that it is there to ensure myself & my colleagues go home in the same "condition" we arrived at work in try that thought sometime!