Question for the moderator: what defining line enabled you to assess ACMS as a threat to this thread, while maintaining PAF's privileges?
I think you're playing favorites, and you don't like hearing that.
------------------------------------
You just don't get it!
ACMS was not sanctioned for the opinions he holds, but for his abusive, childish posts. He has since acknowledged he could have stated his case in a more acceptable manner and is free to post in all threads.
PAF has an opinion and stated his case in a non abusive manner. He has not "crossed the line" but if he does, will receive the same sanctions as ACMS, without fear or favour.
Perhaps you need to understand that each of our quarter million PPRuNe users hold varying views and some of those views may be vastly different than your own. It is for this very reason PPRuNe is the success it is.
Whilst PPRuNe is not a democratic free-for-all, I have no problem with your claim of Moderator bias. I trust you have no problem with me simply ignoring your claim?
Tail Wheel