Amused to see that after the correct comment (and prediction !) from Alphamale, it took little time for the attacks to commence.
Criticising training and competitors is a sadly endemic and typically English trait so.....
Cirruscrystal comes out to knock Naples with neither evidence nor explanation- were you ever there !?
velj then poses with (unspecified) 'personal knowledge' to pop at OBA but 'never a student' !
It might be OK to post critical details which can be checked by the FTO, e.g. I did an ABC at XYZ in 2007 and it was unsatisfactory because: with list of specific details of defined problems.
However, cannot understand why moderator allows anonymous, infantile and unsupported rubbishing which wouldn't be accepted by any tabloid editor let alone a court.
Anyone agree with me?