It seems I've trodden on your belief system. I think I understand your apparent sensitivity now.
You still dont' seem to be able to conduct a reasoned argument without resorting to insult. But then I'm not sure I care what you choose to do to yourself. Passing off your fancies as fact is a different matter.
You chose to make a claim as fact about a product which, whilst it may be a belief you hold dear, is not necessarily the truth.
If your belief about this product provides you with comfort then that's a good thing.
As I said before, I never said that this product you believe so strongly in is ineffective. When I asked for your evidence all you could offer was
1. Your statement that it "improves blood circulation". Your reason for believing this is...?
2. That this is thought to have beneficial effects against tinnitus. Thought by whom? Researchers in this field of study? Or the person behind the counter of the health food shop you frequent?
3. A Dr in a newspaper who says that it may be beneficial. That in itself raises a topic concerning the quality of advice that can be given without a proper medical examination.
----------
"Engine failure in number 1"
"Call it names then, that should fix it"